Skip to content

A Grandmother Reflects on the ‘Miracle’ of 3D Printing

It would be easy for me, a grandmother with over 7 decades of living to my credit, to ignore 3D  printing and the Internet of Things (IoT), thinking I may be long gone by the time these revolutionary ideas really take hold.

But I’m not about to disregard one of the most compelling ideas to emerge in this era of change, considered by leading scientists to be the “Third Industrial Revolution”. After all, just by virtue of having access to the internet, and being able to type a few keywords into my browser, I can have a front row seat to what promises to be a thrilling journey.

3D printing is the manufacturing model that has seized the imagination of thousands of leading edge thinkers who appreciate the magnitude of its potential, and who understand how it fits into the Internet of Things. I am just beginning to understand its importance, how and why it has grown exponentially, how it will operate as a component of the IoT infrastructure, and how it will be a participant in the biggest shift in the history of humans.

While the concept of a 3D printer is revolutionary, and the steps that led to its first prototype took decades, the 3D printer, when you see it operate, seems a simple machine.

This seems so simple!

Basically, material (usually plastic wrapped on a spool) is heated, and then extended (pushed out) and fused layer by layer to build a three dimensional object. Here’s how it works, in a nutshell:

-Models are created with computer programs like TinkerCAD, or SketchUp
(which can be found free and uploaded).
-An STL (STereoLithography) file is created.
-This file converts the model into code the 3D printer understands.
-The code is then translated into a 3D form.

There are two main types of 3D desktop printers, Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) printer and Stereolithography (SLA) printers. Although they both create a physical product from a 3D model, the technologies are quite different, and involve different base materials, with FDM using plastic and SLA using resin. You can find more information about these processes here:

Whereas traditional manufacturing is a subtractive process, involving cutting out pieces from a block of material, 3D printing is an additive process, creating an object by adding layer upon layer of material. Because 3D printers use cheap materials and produce very little waste due to the ‘additive’ process, they are vastly more economically efficient than conventional manufacturing.

The Game Changer

But it is the use of Software directing the molten plastic, molten metal, or other feedstocks inside the printer to create a fully formed object, that sets this process apart from any other type of manufacturing. And that, more than anything else, is the game changer. A program can produce a single item, or 100,000 or more copies. Program data (the code) can be shared and integrated into the far-reaching IoT infrastructure (where free energy and distribution may be accessible).

Today’s 3D printers come with software on a disk or as a download. They are Windows compatible, and in many cases can work with macOS and Linux as well. (It is important to note that the early practitioners of 3D printing have made strides to ensure that the software used to program and print physical products remains open source.) The products range from near useless gadgets to bionic arms, musical instruments and even self-driving cars.

You can see where this is heading. It costs very little to produce designs, which in turn can produce products at very little cost, which can then be distributed and marketed cheaply. These measures have huge implications for the economic status quo of any country.

Words from ‘Inside’

Serious ‘makers’ and ‘hobbyists’ have been following the progress of 3D printers from the outset. Here is a comment from blogger Brian Palacios, reflecting on his introduction to 3D printing:

“When I first discovered 3D printing several years ago, I instantly knew it was magical. My mind was blown by the technology: an almost infinite amount of shapes can be “grown,” layer by layer, just by using a printer. This is going to be disruptive, I knew. It would empower entrepreneurs, freeing them from the constraints of traditional manufacturing.”

Lyndsey Gilpin, co-author of the book, Follow the Geeks, has also tracked the progress of 3D printing for years, and says:

“For better or worse, the 3D printing industry is poised to transform nearly every sector of our lives and jumpstart the next industrial revolution. Sound like a hyperbole? We’ve compiled a list of 10 major impacts the 3D printing ecosystem will have on businesses, consumers, and the global economy.”

An early hobbyist, Brian Proffitt said this in 2013:

“The Internet of Things promises that every object will eventually be hooked up to a network. And 3D printing promises that any object we can imagine, we can build—on site and on demand. And big data promises we’ll know everything there is to know about these networked objects.”

Jeremy Rifkin is the true authority on the Internet of Things, and I have left his prophetic words for last:

“A 3D printing process embedded in an Internet of Things infrastructure means that virtually anyone in the world can become a prosumer, producing his or her own products for use or sharing, employing open-source software. The production process itself uses one-tenth of the material of conventional manufacturing and requires very little human labor in the making of the product. The energy used in the production is generated from renewable energy harvested on-site or locally, at near zero marginal cost. The product is marketed on global marketing websites, again at near zero marginal cost. Lastly, the product is delivered to users in e-mobility transport powered by locally generated renewable energy, again at near zero marginal cost.”

From my perspective of a long life, I can view this as the opening of Pandora’s box, or as an exciting prospect of positive change. But I also know it doesn’t matter what we think or feel about it—its unstoppable, and its happening now.

20 thoughts on “A Grandmother Reflects on the ‘Miracle’ of 3D Printing”

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      I ignored the ‘gun’ threat, because I thought (hoped) that as use of 3D printing reached a critical mass, regulators will be all over it. A printed gun would have to originate with a purchased program, and would be traceable. …and I don’t even want to think about the other alternative!

  1. This article presents a good example where Seniors 50+ can pursue Lifelong Learning & at the same time have the opportunity to become a senior entrepreneur. What am I talking about? We’re focusing on grandmothers here! Grandma will probably not have the opportunity to produce a ‘bionic arm’ unless she has an engineering background and is astute mechanically even though today with advanced education some grandmothers will fall into this category.

    So, what is possible for most grandmothers today? How many grandmothers sew or knit today? Probably almost all of them. Today the same 3D technology has produced the 3D Knitting machine. You will nee a Wi-Fi hotspot and some knitting kits. After gaining some knowledge about knitting patterns it won’t take long before grandma becomes a producing force as a textile manufacturer. How many were able to predict that result?

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      A good point about knitting machines, but I wasn’t thinking along the lines of Grandmothers becoming engineers and producing 3D printed body parts, Joe. Not to belittle the 3D knitting technology—it is truly amazing, and will have real life implications! My purpose here is to alert people my age about what is happening in the tech world, and the huge changes that are beginning right now. I am just beginning to put this together for myself, learning about the forces that will change everything, for our grandchildren, if not for our children. It’s exciting, and a bit frightening at the same time. Thanks so much Joe. I follow your amazing posts on Facebook almost every day!

  2. OMG! This is so interesting! I didn’t know anything about how 3D printing worked. Thank you for looking into it and explaining it in simple terms. The only things I knew were what I had seen on TV, and that’s not “real” knowledge. I can see what you mean in your last paragraph by 3D printing being a possible Pandora’s Box. Certainly some people will find a way to use it for evil purposes. But in the meantime, it has fantastic potential for good. I love the fact that it can be run by renewable energy.

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      So glad you thought my explanation was clear! You point out a reason for concern that I hadn’t thought a lot about—use of the printer for evil purposes. For me, the Pandora’s box consists of the wide net of printer applications, once it becomes part of the IoT. The scope of future use is so wide, we can’t even imagine them!

  3. Thank you Dianne for the very clear explanation of the process. My husband who reads Scientific American like it is a bible, has been talking about this for years. But it wasn’t until I went into Barnes and Noble and saw one for sale that I realized how far the technology has been common place.

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      I have yet to see one, although they are demonstrated on YouTube. I tried to post a video on my article, but sadly, I couldn’t manage it. Maybe next time!

  4. Never a dull moment! Try to enjoy the good new things and not worry too much about the rest. Do the work of worrying when we can by being constructive instead of complaining/fretting.

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      Of course, we need to be constructive. Gaining awareness, however, as I said in my reply to Aunt Beulah, is never a mistake. Thanks, Jean.

  5. I’ve been intrigued, too, with 3D printing. Your description is interesting. I’ve wondered about any recycling potential when I think of all the environmental concerns with plastic — the problems created in the ocean with creatures ingesting indigestible particles & recent story even humans are getting bits, too. Much to consider with all the pros and cons in our future as always.

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      You are right, Joared—one more thing to dump into landfills and the ocean! It’s depressing, but clearly, people need to learn more about the damage the seepage of these materials do.

  6. I’be been fascinated with the amazing things that can be done with 3D printing. They are even talking about making things like individually sized heart valves and other such medical devices.

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      Absolutely. The medical applications sound very promising. I’m on board as long as artificial intelligence benefits humanity!

  7. One of my fears, of course, are the invisible (to scanners) plastic guns. But at the other end of the spectrum, in the tv show “Mars” a few months ago, about our first settlement on Mars, part of their equipment was a 3D printer to print up all sorts of tools, machine parts, repair parts, etc. Whatever unforeseen item that might be needed, all without having to transport tons of stuff that might or might not ever be needed. We’re limited only by our imaginations.

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      You are right to be concerned about the printing of guns, since there are no regulations (that I know of) to regulate that. Hopefully that will be addressed. But imagine a world in which we can just print something we need, like a coffee pot. The implications for coffee pot manufacturers, the people who work in the factories that manufacture coffee pots, and the landfills in which they will be dumped when no longer needed, are huge! The mind boggles!

  8. Yeah, Another Blogger

    Thanks once again, Diane, for lots of detailed info. 3D printing is something I had heard of, but I didn’t know what it was.
    The times we live in are very, very amazing (technologically).

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      I’m have a constant feeling of urgency, thinking that I can’t possibly keep up! And of course, I can’t—it takes a technological genius to know what’s going on.
      But, at the same time, I’m convinced that we have to make the effort to stay informed about the broad strokes, if nothing else. So I’ll keep looking at this, and writing about it. Thanks, Neil!

Comments are closed.

© 2024 Diane Dahli All Rights Reserved | WordPress site by Quadra Street Designs