Skip to content

Gender Equality in Public Office—Why Are We So Far Behind?

It took the near-destruction of a country to achieve what the rest of the world couldn’t—the highest ratio of women to men in their governing body.

Today, Rwanda, a tiny land-locked country in East Africa, has the greatest proportion of women representatives of any country in the world, with women holding 49 out of 80 seats in the nation’s parliament. Yes, that’s 61.3%! It’s gender equality at its most impressive!

In part, this bold development was a direct consequence of the horrific genocide which occurred there in the mid-nineteen nineties: 94 percent of the people accused of participating in it were men, and an overall 70 percent of its survivors were women.

In a speech to a group of Rwandan woman, Paul Kegame, Rwanda’s controversial, visionary president, put this in perspective, saying:

“Gender equality in every sector is not a favor, it is your right,”

So how does Rwanda’s gender status compare with other parts of the world? Here are the next top three:

  • Cuba 53.2%
  • Boliva 53.1%
  • Mexico 48.2%

and so on, down to the USA, with 23.6% and Canada, with 26.9%. (Data provided by National Parliaments, Feb, 2019, based on lower houses of parliament.)

Our statistics are dismal actually, when you consider that we in democratically elected countries, have been at this for a very long time. It is, after all, almost 40 years since another democratic state, Iceland, elected the first woman to ever become a head of state in an election.

The role of women in Icelandic politics

When Vigdís Finnbogadóttir, a divorced single mother, ran for president in 1980, women made up only 5% of parliamentarians in that nation, but that didn’t intimidate her—she won, she stayed, and she changed her country.

Alexandra Topping, in a December 7, 2017 article for the Guardian, writes more about this issue, quoting Brynhildur Heiðar, executive manager of the Icelandic Women’s Rights Association as saying :

There is absolutely no doubt that there is an equivalency between more gender-balanced political representation and better policies for women, Parental leave, daycare, the gender pay gap – none of these were seen as major issues before women ran for parliament.”

Reported in this same article, Auður Styrkársdóttir, former director of Iceland’s Women’s History Archive, had this to say:

“If this tiny nation has anything to teach the States, it is this: don’t give up. Just keep going, Icelandic women aren’t here because it was handed to us – we had to fight all the way, and we are still fighting.”

It’s not enough to fight for the rights of women as we have done for decades, by joining political parties, forming committees, raising money for our favorite candidates, and so on. If women want their issues introduced and pushed in parliament, they need to be there! Electing women to positions of power benefits women and families, period.

Are we due to finally see some change?

It’s a simple enough idea, yet years and decades drag by with little improvement in gender equality in government.

Today may be different. We may at last see inequalities in political representation change. Women in America and Canada have been awakened by the dangers of having a despotic leader in charge in the US, and may now realize that the only way to ensure the well being of women and families is to be part of the government themselves.

That takes dedication and work—and commitment from woman voters as well as women politicians. Let’s hope that we are all up to it!

22 thoughts on “Gender Equality in Public Office—Why Are We So Far Behind?”

  1. In India, we have had very powerful women politicians starting with Indira Gandhi as Prime Minister, and many others holding Central Cabinet Ministerial posts.

    Our recently concluded elections saw a lady politician Smriti Irani trouncing a Gandhi/Nehru dynasty politician Rahul Gandhi very convincingly.

    At state level, we have had many Chief Ministers like Mayawati, Mamata Banerjee, Sheila Dixit, Jayalalitha etc as well as cabinet ministers.

    There have been many powerful policewomen and bureaucrats besides highly successful business women.

    Admittedly, we still have a long way to go but, in my not so humble opinion, we have done better than most countries of the world.

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      You are right, Rummuser. Indira Gandhi was a shining example for the women of her nation, and I believe it was through her success that we saw so many women choose public life. As a young woman, I followed her success with admiration, and was shocked and saddened when her life ended so tragically. Thanks for bringing your perspective to this issue!

  2. Hi Diane! I agree with the statement this we simply must get involved in whatever ways we can…it’s far too important to leave to chance or hoping someone else will do it for us. The time is now. I remain hopeful about the future but don’t think it will happen without the work and dedication you call for. ~Kathy

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      I think that the mid-term elections in the US demonstrated that women of all ages and abilities are available to join the movement toward becoming more involved. I do, however, believe that it is just the beginning…

  3. Thanks for bringing this back to our attention. I did not know these statistics about Rwanda, or about Iceland’s woman leader. Today Theresa May and Andrea Merkel are important leaders, and Nancy Pelosi (Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives) is third in line for presidential succession. But we need LOTS more women in positions of power where they can bring change.

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      Each one of the women you mention has had enormous challenges in the positions they hold. This is not a coincidence. I believe that much more is expected of women leaders—and mistakes are not easily forgiven. Having more women in power would make the electorate accept them more readily. It would not be such an anomaly.I have no easy answers as to how to narrow the gap, except to start with younger women, through an all-out campaign!

  4. Timely post, Diane. It’s amazing to think that in 2019, I’m still reading headlines in the U.S. about fear of nominating a woman for president in 2020 (in this case, because of the 2016 result, which as we all know was about a lot more than gender). A 2015 Gallup poll revealed that “More than 90 percent of Americans said they would vote for a woman, a black candidate, a Jewish candidate or a Latino candidate, while fewer than 10 percent said they would not.”

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      Yet women make up at least 50% of the population, so that should put them at an advantage, when discussing minorities. Wait a minute—women are NOT a minority! We should be working towards 50% of the representation. I guess I can dream on…

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      You won’t get an argument from me! However, I’d be happy with 50%—no sense in being greedy! In all fairness, there is no guarantee that women would be less warlike as leaders, although most women tend to lean towards being peacemakers.

  5. An interesting post, Diane. Here in the UK 32% of our elected House of Commons are female, but only 26% of the unelected House of Lords. Maybe they could start by renaming it? Neither is a particularly good representation of the population split as a whole, but I suspect there are issues at play such as those you allude to, particularly the apparent fear of nominating and electing female candidates. But having said that, gender is no guarantee of performance, whichever way you look at it. We have had two female Prime Ministers: the first is probably the most divisive we have ever had, and is still reviled by many; the second is the most inept there has been in my lifetime. I’d rather have someone I could trust to run the country, whatever physical bits they possess!

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      Yes, Clive, you have had two diverse, and problematic female Prime Ministers. I despised your first, but didn’t really think ineptitude was the problem with Theresa May. I thought that her colleagues may not have given her a fair shake, but now I think I may have been wrong. She really did mess up the Brexit issue!

      1. I’m glad you’re coming round to my view of the Maybot! She mixed ineptitude with a dogmatic refusal to consider alternative ways of doing things, and has contributed in a major way towards the omnishambles we are now in.

  6. Clearly attitudes toward women have dictated the situation in the U.S. Unless voters put more women in office the existing power sources have their own agenda.

  7. Let’s face it, it would be hard to do worse than men are doing these days. I’d love to see government filled with a preponderance of women.

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      It gets closer and closer, let’s see how this latest Trump-initiated crisis (closing of the clinics) unfolds!

Comments are closed.

© 2024 Diane Dahli All Rights Reserved | WordPress site by Quadra Street Designs