Skip to content

In a New Decade, Is There Hope For a Better World?

I know it’s only symbolic, and time moves on whether we record it or not, but a new year has always been significant for me. As the calendar wound down this past week to the 31st of December, I couldn’t help but feel a twinge of anticipation. This year the numbers flipped to a new decade, and it seems more important than ever to mark it in some way.

It doesn’t surprise me that there are others who give special meaning to the ending of one decade and the beginning of another. And I wasn’t surprised, either, since there is a study for almost anything, to discover six studies that examined how some people respond to the approach of a new decade.  The researchers (Princeton U.,Alter and Hershfield, 2014) suggest that people are prone to making significant decisions as a new decade arrives.

The six studies looked at how people became more self-reflective as they approached a new decade, and how in their personal lives, some made major changes such as seeking extramarital affairs or in extreme cases, ending their lives. It suggests also that a change of decades can stimulate a psychological crisis, or a search for existential meaning.

If a change in decades does stimulate us to reflect more deeply on our lives and the world we live in, we have plenty to focus on today. It’s easy to become pessimistic as we look back at the previous decade. I’ll be especially happy to forget the past three years—the anxiety generated by troubling political developments all over the world, the general neglect by governments about the climate crisis, the suffering of people forced to leave their countries in droves, only to be turned away.

But just as I was sinking into a pit of negativity about the future, I was heartened by two events that occurred this past week:

A neighbor (thanks John) forwarded me a New York Times article by Nicholas Kristof , (December 31, 2019) which makes the following points:

“In the long arc of human history, 2019 has been the best year ever. …since modern humans emerged about 200,000 years ago, 2019 was probably the year in which children were least likely to die, adults were least likely to be illiterate and people were least likely to suffer excruciating and disfiguring diseases. Every single day in recent years, another 325,000 people got their first access to electricity. Each day, more than 200,000 got piped water for the first time. And some 650,000 went online for the first time, every single day.”

That same day, I found another source, closer to home, (Times Colonist editorial, December 31, 2019) which made these optimistic observations:

“The unprecedented access of people around the world to information via the internet is creating new generations with broader horizons and immensely improved access to learning. As a result, our world is safer and saner than in any time in history…Globally, altruism and enlightenment are slowly extinguishing famine and plagues. A century ago, a majority of the world’s population lived in poverty. The average life expectancy was 35. Today, only 10 per cent struggle below the poverty line and life expectancy has more than doubled.”

I’m aware that improving the lives of poor people and increasing life expectancy concerns many people—they fear an escalation in world population as a result. My own view is that while people worry about the impact of elevating living conditions for everyone on this fragile planet, there is no good outcome in keeping people poor. In fact, by increasing the standard of living, people tend to have fewer children. Here are some examples of how a reduction in poverty can affect family size: 

  • In 1994, the average family in Cambodia had nearly 6 children; by 2015, extreme poverty (living on less than $1.25 per day) in Cambodia had fallen more than 40% and average family size had decreased by more than half.
  • The last 20 years in Namibia have seen extreme poverty rates fall by 20% and the average family size halved.

There is reason to believe, as the editor of the Times Colonist says, that these trends will persist in 2020 insuring that the steady curve towards betterment will continue. We can only hope that these predictions are true.

There is also reason to believe that some people will experience this new decade as a significant ending and an opportunity for a new start, and others will view it as just another number—there is no correct way to approach time!  I’m choosing to see 2020 as a new beginning, approaching it in the hope that this decade will bring some new and positive changes in the world.

In closing, I wish you all, Dear Readers, a Happy New Year, with the very best of health and much happiness!

26 thoughts on “In a New Decade, Is There Hope For a Better World?”

  1. I’d love to be optimistic about the next decade, but politicians and governments tend to dispel that for me. I hope my pessimism is proved wrong! Happy New Year to you too, Diane.

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      Politicians and governments…they do put a damper on optimism, don’t they? Let’s hope they take a back seat and let smarter people lead the way

      1. I don’t have much hope that will happen. They are too stupid to recognise their own stupidity, and too egotistical to consider it a possibility!

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      Thanks, Barry. I didn’t look for it—optimism seemed to be a trending theme as 2020 approached. Let’s see if it can be maintained!

  2. I’m afraid this reminds me of the fellow who jumped off the Empire State Building. As he was passing the 40th floor someone asked him, “How’s it going?” He answered, “Just great so far!”

    A hundred years ago we had the Roaring 20’s. I wonder what they will call this decade?

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      I think the 1980s, the decade of excess and self-absorption, was more akin to the roaring twenties. The world has become more battered and realistic since then, and I think people are much more cynical, which is not a bad thing. I think this decade will be like none other, since we have developments in media and artificial intelligence that we could never have imagined in any other period.

  3. Democracy or even the desire for peace doesn’t seem to exist based on the actions of the politicians today.. We are now seeing the people not the politicians making a significant difference. Whether it’s the Arab Spring, the ‘Me Too’ Movement or the Hong Kong situation democracy needs more aggressive action by the people. I also think that ageism will only be eliminated when the people start their own march in the streets. Last year we had the Radical Age Movement which started in New York City. This movement had all the good intentions but possibly not the right leadership to sustain it. Now in 2020 we have another movement scheduled for June 22/20. It will be a march on Washington, DC. I think that seniors could support this specific movement by walking with the people that are mainly protesting poverty issues. if this happens and is successful I think that an optimistic picture for 2020 is realistic and possible but in most cases it will be dependent on the actions of the people NOT the politicians. Happy New Year to everyone in this group!

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      Thanks Joe! I agree with you about the importance and promise of a grass-roots movement to address several urgent issues. I don’t think ageism resonates with many people though, for the simple reason that no one imagines the implications until they are actually there. Unlike sexism and racism (and other ‘isms’), age affects everyone, if they live long enough, and no one is concerned with doing anything about it until they, themselves actually become old. It’s a conundrum to be sure!

  4. Thank you for a positive post during these unpredictable times. The statistics you quoted were enlightening and encouraging. Politicians are a breed of their own making (with our help) and have long abandoned the notion of ‘service,” so that is a whole other discussion. Maybe if we stopped wailing ‘woe is me’, pointing fingers at people we disagree with and look for ways to stand together, we’d all be a bit more optimistic about the future.

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      Of course, that’s the way all change will come. Joe, well-known ‘seniorpreneur’ comments on this issue (see above), and I can’t say it better than he does!

  5. It’s interesting to think about optimism and pessimism. Understanding that we cannot think of two things at exactly the same time it seems that each is a reaction to what we are considering at any given moment. As a Westerner the thought of anything new is apt to be somewhat optimistic (I say somewhat because in Nov. 2016 something ‘new’ happened and I was not at ALL optimistic) but in general a ‘clean slate’ is a happy thought. Thoughts of access to clean water, the internet, improving health and education (PLEASE let us add greater access to the right to vote,) are a wonderful basis for optimism. I am prepared for good while being fairly conditioned to coexist with current hard truths.

    Happy New Year/Decade/Month/Week,Day.

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      Such good ideas here! I agree that situations do not become positive just by virtue of being new…as happened during the election in 2019. I’m glad you made the point about the right to vote, since that is the absolute foundation of democracy.

  6. I guess we’re both taking heart in Kristof’s essay, and I truly believe things will continue to get better, in fits and starts, as they have for at least a couple of hundred years, if not a couple of millennia.

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      Yes, Tom, that IS the human experience. As long as the cycle bends towards the positive once in a while, we are heartened and carry on!

  7. I was feeling pretty positive until early yesterday afternoon when I realised the sunlight had disappeared and then as I looked closely outdoors realised that everything had an orange/yellow eerie glow, the sky was just weird…the sun disappeared, and anything I wanted to do in certain rooms in the house, I needed the el.light on. The only thing that looked bright and white was this computer screen…

    Finally the smoke from the bush fires in Australia had travelled over 2000km on a air stream/wind and was covering my entire city in New Zealand (Auckland). The strange glow had been in the SI last week, but yesterday it was the NI’s turn…early evening and the orange glow was still with us but the skies had gone a ghostly shade of something, not quite white and certainly less black/grey/yellow it had been; and with no sun it was cold-as. I retrieved some winter bedding and actually wore sox to bed – we are supposed to be doing summer!

    Apparently it had to do with wind direction and although this morning it had dispersed, it was because yet again our small landmass had a change of air flow – and instead of it returning to summer, we had a very cold southerly from the Antarctic – with howling winds…and now in evening of Monday, I’m not sure what tomorrow will bring…

    We’ve been told by the fire=weather people that we’ll get some more orange days but not until the winds change to that way…oh and by the way the bush fire smoke has now reached South America…

    Most people in NZ, have friends and family in Aussie – at this point most of them are in cities and have been affected daily by the smoke, but one friend was evacuated from a tiny coastal town last week, but has been allowed to return home…

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      That is very shocking, Cedar51. We had a similar experience two summers ago, when our forest fires were completely out of control. The sun turned orange, and a shroud of fog covered our city, even though the fires were hundreds of miles away. Since then, we have had rainier periods, and there has not been a repeat performance. It was scary, and there is nothing to say it won’t happen again. We follow the news from Australia, and worry about the habitat, the people and the animals. How sad!

  8. There is a book by Steven Pinker on the same subject written in 2015 which while being more or less on the same wave length as Kristoff, concludes withe some brutal truths. I too hope that the twenties will bring about more peace but, what has happened in the middle East in the last two days, does not augur well at least for the immediate future and climate change and its impact like the fires in Australia leaves one wondering. India is going through a period of tension as well and so, I would be cautiously optimistic.

    By the way, surely the new decade will start from year one? ie 2021 as 2020 should be the last year of the previous decade.

    1. Still the Lucky Few

      I’ll look up Pinkers’ book—thanks for the suggestion. I agree, recent news about Iran and Australia is grim. But I’ve lived long enough to remember other frightening times, and have developed a philosophical attitude. One could argue that it may be a ‘head-in-the-sand’ attitude, though. I’m really not sure. The arguments about when a new decade begins or ends rages on—remember the confusion about the dates for the new millennium? I think I’ll stick with the popular notion!

  9. Thank you for this uplifting and positive post. I read that NYT article with interest, too, and hope. May we all see the year ahead with 2020 vision. 🙂

  10. Hi, and a belated Happy New Year.
    I’m not in the optimist camp when it comes to mankind’s future. The problems we’ve created are enormous. Human overpopulation puts huge stress on water and other resources. We’re on very thin ice, in my opinion.

Comments are closed.

© 2024 Diane Dahli All Rights Reserved | WordPress site by Quadra Street Designs